Categorized | Opinions

Crime vs. internet

It is no secret that SOPA and PIPA have sparked a worldwide, multi-media controversy. As further amendments have continued to delay the resolution of the bills, new threats have risen as a result. However, in the midst of it all is perhaps a greater moral dilemma.

Kim Dotcom, owner of the multi-billion dollar site Megaupload, is now faced with potentially 20 years in prison for an assortment of crimes. While his involvement in these crimes has not been disputed, many individuals are beginning to question to the integrity of the justice system.

While Dotcom is being made an example of by the global community, thousands of pedophiles and sex offenders are walking free with nothing more than a slap on the wrist. Granted, I understand the wide variety of crimes which can lead to a “sex” crime (i.e. urinating in public), however, there are far too many offenders who have brutally assaulted another individual and have not been reprimanded for their acts.

The hypocrisy of the internet is perplexing as individuals such as Julian Assange who have exposed corporations and government agencies are made out to be criminals while Mark Zuckerberg, founder of Facebook, is deemed “Man of the Year” after selling users’ private information to corporations for profit.

Often forgotten is Phillip Greaves, the author of “The Pedophile’s Guide to Love and Pleasure: A Child-Lover’s Code of Conduct.” In 2010, Greaves published this “how-to” guide and sold copies via Amazon.com. Protected by the freedom of speech, the guide explained how to rape and molest young children in great detail and illustration. Additionally, the book featured how to properly groom and prepare children for sexual acts and how to teach them to lie to their parents after. Greaves received two years probation and did not have to register as a sex offender.

Perhaps even more disturbing is the story of Junko Furuta, a 17-year-old Japanese girl who was horrifically tortured for 44 days. Her captors brutally raped and mutilated her for over a month and for their crimes received eight years. They are currently walking free amongst the rest of society.

Similarly, Joran Van Der Sloot, the main suspect in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway recently admitted to murdering Stephany Flores. Van Der Sloot’s infamous ties to international crimes have made the worldwide community aware of the need for unifying policies and cohesion.

While the governments of the world have banded together against piracy, unspeakable crimes are being committed against their citizens. They are more unified against the idea of losing monetary funds than the protection of their people. The cyber world has deeply disturbed the morals and integrity of individuals as the intangible has become more important than the livelihood of those who use the internet.

Dotcom is certainly not the villain that the media has made him out to be when compared to individuals such as Joran Van Der Sloot and Phillip Greaves are victimizing real individuals in the real world.

This post was written by:

- who has written 43 posts on University Chronicle.


Contact the author

  • http://www.facebook.com/retroglamour Shana Rowan

    There is far more to sex crime legislation than the few examples you’ve provided here. First, please be aware that for all the offenders who receive a “slap on the wrist”, there are many more who are sitting in prison for years to come, others in civil commitment (which is essentially a never-ending sentence), others who may be finished with their sentences and living “freely”. But rest assured they are not “free”. If you think it is easy for a former offender to do the things that most of us don’t even think about – for example, get a job, pursue a relationship or friendship, enjoy any kind of security or privacy in their own home – think again. Unlike ANY other criminal – violent or not – they pay for the rest of their lives. They AND their families, who are completely innocent of any crime, are easy targets for vigilantes, discrimination, and public humiliation.

    I know what you’re thinking, it’s what everyone else thinks. Sex offenders hurt children and steal their innocence, or they violently rape women and torture them. Some of them do. And those individuals deserve to be punished, just like someone who murders or physically assaults another person. But the majority of “sex offenders” are not violent, they are not child molesters, they are not rapists. Did you know that a quarter of all registered sex offenders are CHILDREN under age 18? Did you know that the recidivism rate for sex offenders has consistently been proven to be much lower than almost EVERY other felony (long before the registry was public information, so it’s not a result of the legislation we have now)? Your perception of sex offenders and sex crime has clearly been skewed by the way they are portrayed by the media. Are some monsters? Of course. But most aren’t, and punishment is not the same as prevention. Until you and the rest of society realizes that punishing people for the rest of their lives is doing absolutely nothing to stop these crimes from happening in the first place, nothing will change.

    Educate yourself. http://www.endsexcrime.org

The University Chronicle apologizes for the mistaken ad that was run here